PsyCove
PERSONA MUSEUM · PERSONALITY ARCHIVE
PERSONALITY ARCHIVE
P
PsyCove
Your personal archetype
NO. ····Setting up…
0%
CatalogueCompareFrameUnveil
Cataloguing your answers…
Editorial team
The in-house editorial team behind PsyCove's test reports, guides, and long-form articles. We are editors, not clinicians, and we say so on every page that could be mistaken for advice.
PsyCove Editorial is not a panel of psychologists. Nobody here holds a clinical license, and no article on this site has been reviewed by a licensed clinician. What we do have is a reading and checking process, and it is the same one for every piece we publish.
First, every claim that could change what a reader does is traced to a named source. Where a finding rests on one small study, the article says so instead of generalizing. Every entry in a reference list is checked against Crossref; books carry no DOI and are not given one, because inventing an identifier is worse than leaving the entry plain.
Second, every conclusion gets its boundary written next to it — what the study measured, what it did not measure, and what would make the claim false. This is the part readers skip and the part that decides whether a page is honest.
Third, we do not publish the things this genre usually publishes: no diagnosis, no implied symptoms, no predictions about your future, and no framing that invites employers or schools to screen people with our tests. When the evidence behind one of our own frameworks is thinner than the marketing suggests, the article says that too.
Articles are revised when the underlying evidence changes, not when the calendar says so. If you find a claim here that a cited study does not support, the correction is welcome and will be made in the article, not in a footnote.